Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 12:50:40 +0200 From: jg@euronet.nl (Jan_Guldemond) To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Routing problem, again :-( Message-ID: <199504101050.MAA10436@mail.euronet.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I'm setting up the routing-tables. Here's the situation: I have two machines connected with a null-modem cable using a SLIP connection. First machine: ed1 : 193.78.175.65 netmask 0xffffffc0 sl0 : 193.78.175.65 --> 193.78.175.129 netmask 0xffffffc0 routing: 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 193.78.175.64 link#1 UC 0 0 ed1 193.78.175.128 193.78.175.129 UGSc 0 0 sl0 193.78.175.129 193.78.175.65 UH 1 0 sl0 I've added the .128-net manually: route add -netmask 0xffffffc0 -net 193.78.175.128 193.78.175.129 I thought that this means that all trafic for 193.78.175.129 to .190 is forwarded to .129 through the SLIP-connection, or am I wrong?? Second machine: ed1 : 193.78.175.129 netmask 0xffffffc0 sl0 : 193.78.175.129 --> 193.78.175.65 netmask 0xffffffc0 routing: default 193.78.175.65 UGSc 1 69 sl0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 193.78.175.65 193.78.175.129 UH 1 101 sl0 193.78.175.128 link#2 UC 0 0 ed1 193.78.175.129 0:0:1b:4f:bd:fc UHLW 0 5 lo0 193.78.175.140 8:0:0:19:52:72 UHLW 0 2 ed1 The .140 - entry was added automaticly by the system when the MS-Windows workstation (on the LAN) was switched on. I trief pinging: .65 to .129 (slip) : ok .129 to .65 (slip) : ok .129 to .140 (ether) : ok .140 to .129 (ether) : not tested, no ping-client .65 to .140 (slip->ether) : No route to host .140 to .65 (ehter->slip) : not tested, no ping-client Why does .65 say "No route to host" I've added the .128-subnet to the routing table, haven't I??? Why can't it "see" that the .140 host is in the .128 subnet???
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504101050.MAA10436>