Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 14:20:36 +0200 From: Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com> To: Freebsd fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD Message-ID: <5C15DFF5-661E-47ED-B84B-6BE477A2DE5C@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <39c45819-2754-ed73-a0e7-681969f58de7@freebsd.org> References: <87y3r0ankb.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <39c45819-2754-ed73-a0e7-681969f58de7@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 03 Aug 2017, at 22:22, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > On 3/8/17 7:38 pm, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >> I am the upstream maintainer of libfuse. I'd like to refresh / = improve >> the FreeBSD support in libfuse. My goal is for libfuse not to require >> any FreeBSD specific patches. >=20 > Hi, great to hear from you! > at $JOB we use libfuse and We have always worried that we don't really > have anyone in FreeBSD that really has fuse as a priority. Glad to hear from Nikolaus too, seeing that efforts are taken to keep libfuse FreeBSD compatible out of the box ! For sure this is great ! I also hugely use fuse, so having it to work correctly (at least = bug-free) is mandatory for me. > Rick Maclem has looked at it a little, as have a few people (see the = commit logs) > but generally as long as it more or less works, people tend to steer > clear of it. >=20 > For us libfuse "just worked" so we haven't touched it. > We had to touch the kernel part of fuse a little so remove some overly = restrictive > permission checks, and fix some issues to do with page boundaries = (from memory) > but nothing in the library. I've also reported a few bugs which were in kernel, and have been = corrected thanks to the great FreeBSD community. Fuse kernel support lacks some features, such as entry_timeout / = attr_timeout (reported), but it then concerns kernel, not libfuse. Thx ! Ben=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5C15DFF5-661E-47ED-B84B-6BE477A2DE5C>