From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Nov 24 10:47:34 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA04768
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 10:47:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA04759
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 10:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.2/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA02874; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 10:46:58 -0800 (PST)
To: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Replacing sendmail (Re: non-root users binding to ports < 1024 (was: Re: BoS: Exploit for sendmail smtpd bug (ver. 8.7-8.8.2).)) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 24 Nov 1996 08:14:53 CST."
             <199611241414.IAA27560@bonkers.taronga.com> 
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 10:46:58 -0800
Message-ID: <2872.848861218@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Remove sendmail. Make it an option. Make qmail the primary mail transport
> agent on FreeBSD. If someone needs a really complex mail routing environment

[Whap!]

If I ever catching you sniffing glue again, young man, there's going
to be trouble.  At the very least, don't post email while under the
influence. :-)

					Jordan

P.S. Needless to say, this is a terrible idea.  The user QA alone
would murder us.