Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:58:18 -0700 From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@courtesan.com> To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@wasabisystems.com> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>, wes@softweyr.com, tlambert2@mindspring.com, asmodai@wxs.nl, mckusick@mckusick.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@wemm.org, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, deatley@apple.com, jkh@winston.freebsd.org, deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org Subject: Re: __P macro question Message-ID: <200201311658.g0VGwIDx006748@xerxes.courtesan.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "31 Jan 2002 11:43:41 EST." <87d6zq31z6.fsf@snark.piermont.com> References: <20020131072933.GQ22384@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <3C58F78E.3F66EA8E@mindspring.com> <3C58FBEC.746257BB@softweyr.com> <20020131.085938.18394797.imp@village.org> <87d6zq31z6.fsf@snark.piermont.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <87d6zq31z6.fsf@snark.piermont.com>
so spake "Perry E. Metzger" (perry):
> If you do it by hand, we'll get source diffs by accident. If we build
> a quick set of scripts to do it, since we'll all be using the same
> scripts, we'll end up with fewer diffs.
Speaking of which, what do folks think about things like:
int f1 __P((int, char));
void f2 __P((long));
ie: where there is whitespace between the function name and the
arguments. My inclination is to remove the extra whitespace during
the conversion, like so:
int f1(int, char);
void f2(long);
If we want to minimize useless whitespace differences it would be
good if we all use the same scheme ;-)
- todd
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201311658.g0VGwIDx006748>