Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:02:27 -0800 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing executables with generic names Message-ID: <4F3ABDD3.4010206@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo839jaOOzW3X4UK1eYSWU_akX9SoKi%2Bj9JWYVKi8KTN546Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <4F3A60FE.7050009@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3A7CDF.8000405@freebsd.org> <4F3A895D.9040609@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3A907C.5060305@freebsd.org> <20120214201721.11e74bbb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4F3AAD8D.2040609@aldan.algebra.com> <CADLo839jaOOzW3X4UK1eYSWU_akX9SoKi%2Bj9JWYVKi8KTN546Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/14/2012 11:27, Chris Rees wrote: > bin/foo-bar means it can still be called without an explicit path, so that > is better. > > Look for autoconf hooks to add prefices this way (if it uses configure...) Please also don't forget to scream at the upstream to stop using such generic names too. Otherwise we're going to potentially be looking at a lot of patching in dependent ports: s#generic#foo-generic# -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3ABDD3.4010206>