From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 7 10:35:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D10937B401 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 10:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gatorzone.com (gatormail.gatorzone.com [216.53.131.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C913A43FBF for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 10:35:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cd_freebsd@gatorzone.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 13:39:44 -0400 Message-Id: <200306071339.AA203489334@gatorzone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "cd_freebsd" To: X-Mailer: Subject: RE: Mapping Physical Memory without a Device? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cd_freebsd@gatorzone.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 17:35:15 -0000 After sending my first note, I found pmap_mapdev. Anything wrong with using that?