From owner-freebsd-gnome Mon Jan 21 13:10:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2C337B42C for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6155D0A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:20 -0800 (PST) To: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: xscreensaver-4.0 configures "without-gnome" Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:10:20 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20020121211020.9C6155D0A@ptavv.es.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I recently updated my xscreensaver port for 4.0 and noticed that it configured "--without-gnome". I edited the Makefile to change this and got a version of xscreensaver that provided a MUCH nicer interface in the Gnome Control Center. I have not seen any problems to this point. Is there any reason not to build xscreensaver this way? Would it be reasonable to modify the Makefile to build with-gnome when gnome is present? I have not tried it yet, but it looks trivial. Or would a separate 'xscreensaver-gnome' be better? R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message