From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 08:33:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8B6106566B for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from s.seira@cdmon.com) Received: from correo.cdmon.com (correo.cdmon.com [212.36.82.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042B48FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from genocida (localhost.cdmon.com [127.0.0.1]) by correo.cdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A904131167 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:15:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antispam (localhost.cdmon.com [127.0.0.1]) by correo.cdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6139131161 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:15:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.30] (155.Red-88-2-251.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.2.251.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by correo.cdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6911713110A for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:15:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4D958999.30207@cdmon.com> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:15:21 +0200 From: Sergi Seira User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100515 Lightning/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: background fsck high load on 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:33:00 -0000 Hello, we've experienced that background fsck on 8.1 degrades server performance on a higher degree than in previous fbsd versions (6.3, 7.3; amd64). We've noticed it after upgrading - same hardware - to a 8.1-RELEASE. Now, performance of other services (i.e. apache, mysql) during a background fsck falls miserably. Is there any way to calm fsck down?, nice(1)?, some sysctl? We have also gmirror, but we prevent to rebuild it if there is a fsck running in background. Thanks for your help, regards, Sergi