From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 08:50:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6BC37B401; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jamus.xpert.com (apache.xpert.com [199.203.132.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE5A43FD7; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:50:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Yonatan@xpert.com) Received: from EXCHANGE.xpert.com (exchange.xpert.com [199.203.132.135]) by jamus.xpert.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6EFlvX17037; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:47:57 +0300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:49:28 +0300 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ports/54473: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0 Thread-Index: AcNKHDhJgpzVEbmsRN+qS3WPd6BBoQAA1Hpg From: "Yonatan Bokovza" To: "Sergey A. Osokin" , Subject: RE: ports/54473: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:50:05 -0000 yes, firewalk depends on libnet-devel and libdnet. I don't know of any breakage with IPFW2. Would it be OK if we detect/warn about it in the Makefile?