From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 09:25:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB4F106566B for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost06.isp.att.net (fmailhost06.isp.att.net [204.127.217.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBDB8FC13 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:25:45 +0000 (GMT) X-Comment: Sending client does not conform to RFC822 minimum requirements X-Comment: Date has been added by Maillennium Received: from localhost (adsl-72-147-183-55.sdf.bellsouth.net[72.147.183.55]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc06) with SMTP id <20110920092545H0600a74oke>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:25:45 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [72.147.183.55] From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20110920062349.GA84006@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Message-Id: <20110920092547.9FB4F106566B@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:25:47 -0000 ><"Thomas Mueller There was a typo on my part that I failed to correct, missing > at the end of From: "Thomas Mueller" and others on the boot partition: So the 64 KB boot partition, nonbootable on my computer, is for legacy BIOS and no good on UEFI? But I was able to boot the installation memstick for BETA1 and BETA2. If the 64 KB boot partition is nonfunctional for me, I'd like it to be optional. Or maybe the installation would go through even without the boot partition? I notice there is no /usr/mdec directory in FreeBSD 9.0-to-be as there was in FreeBSD 8.2 and still is in NetBSD. Another question on the same general topic, the new bsdinstaller: Is the home directory supposed to be /home or /usr/home? I wanted /home, but the installer made /home into a symbolic link to /usr/home, I corrected this successfully, but later saw, regarding PC-BSD 9.0-BETA2: (quoting) Auto correct if user tries to use /home to /usr/home (end of quote) I think I did rm /home mv /usr/home / Tom