From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Sep 17 9:41:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D139C37B410 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.209] (helo=mrvdom02.schlund.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15j1SN-0006bq-00; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:41:15 +0200 Received: from pd9017210.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.1.114.16]) by mrvdom02.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15j1SN-0006QM-00; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:41:15 +0200 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:41:04 +0200 (CEST) From: "P. U. (Uli) Kruppa" To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: , Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD over Redhat Linux? In-Reply-To: <200109170614.f8H6EVv65208@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Message-ID: <20010917163849.I742-100000@pukruppa.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > Nathan Mace writes: > > > as a recent convert from linux to freebsd...i can give you MANY reasons > > > > 1) RPM's suck....plain and simple. the ports collection beats RPM in > > every way > > Huh? The RPM system seems to work fine. Commonly people complain > about using random RPM files off the net, but hey, that is like > complaining that FreeBSD ports don't work so great on NetBSD. > You can even get source RPM files, if you feel the urge to waste > some CPU time. And of course the most best way to run RPMs is to use FreeBSD's linux-emulation ;-) Uli. *--------------------------------------* | www.pukruppa.de www.2000d.de | | Wuppertal - Germany | *--------------------------------------* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message