Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 15:27:50 +0800 From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org> To: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 466d866ac89a - main - net/haproxy: revert QUIC support: it does not work with non-OpenSSL SSL implementations. We need to explicitly support LibreSSL. Message-ID: <CAKBkRUwMiZgT_h6GVt7nBGmCg_wLt-tUpUN9wLmK8wzUuWbD5w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202312290614.3BT6EGpi079322@gitrepo.freebsd.org> References: <202312290614.3BT6EGpi079322@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000e70e9e060da0f80a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:14=E2=80=AFPM Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.or= g> wrote: > The branch main has been updated by demon: > > URL: > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=3D466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96= b18e7526a2b > > commit 466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b > Author: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> > AuthorDate: 2023-12-29 06:04:51 +0000 > Commit: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> > CommitDate: 2023-12-29 06:10:44 +0000 > > net/haproxy: revert QUIC support: it does not work with non-OpenSSL > SSL implementations. We need to explicitly support LibreSSL. > > PR: 267388 > Reported by: Ivan Rozhuk <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> > Please ignore me if the patch supports both SSL implementations comes very soon. This seems a bit pity to me. Is it acceptable if we mark QUIC is broken on non-OpenSSL while working on the further improvements? I feel we already made a small step forward and it's not necessary to revert everything back, as it's adding new feature and not breaking the existing ones. Best, Li-Wen --000000000000e70e9e060da0f80a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail= _attr">On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:14=E2=80=AFPM Dmitry Sivachenko <<a hre= f=3D"mailto:demon@freebsd.org">demon@freebsd.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><b= lockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-le= ft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The branch main has been up= dated by demon:<br> <br> URL: <a href=3D"https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=3D466d866ac89abb1= 884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://cgi= t.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=3D466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b</= a><br> <br> commit 466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b<br> Author:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org><br> AuthorDate: 2023-12-29 06:04:51 +0000<br> Commit:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org><br> CommitDate: 2023-12-29 06:10:44 +0000<br> <br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 net/haproxy: revert QUIC support: it does not work with non-O= penSSL SSL implementations.=C2=A0 We need to explicitly support LibreSSL.<b= r> <br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 PR:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0267388<br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Reported by:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ivan Rozhuk <<a href=3D"mailto:r= ozhuk.im@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">rozhuk.im@gmail.com</a>><br></bloc= kquote><div>=C2=A0</div><div>Please ignore me if the patch supports both SS= L implementations comes very soon.</div><div><br></div><div>This seems a bi= t pity to me. Is it acceptable if we mark QUIC is broken on non-OpenSSL whi= le working on the further improvements? I feel we already made a small step= forward and it's not necessary to revert everything back, as it's = adding new feature and not breaking the existing ones.<br></div><div><br></= div><div>Best,<br></div><div>Li-Wen<br></div></div></div> --000000000000e70e9e060da0f80a--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKBkRUwMiZgT_h6GVt7nBGmCg_wLt-tUpUN9wLmK8wzUuWbD5w>