From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 7 11:53:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2340837B65D for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:53:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA63920; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:53:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Matthew Luckie Cc: Subject: Re: syscall kernel modules on 3.0-release References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 07 Feb 2001 20:53:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: Matthew Luckie's message of "Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:36:10 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Luckie writes: > I completely understand your plea to not use 3.0 release. > I am personally using 4.2-stable. Its not my decision to use 3.0 > I beleive the computers running 3.0 have been running it for several years > now - i.e. it was the latest available at the time. Well, it was a stupid decision at that time, and the decision not to upgrade or replace these machines now is even stupider. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message