From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 19 23:29:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E1416A4B3 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smithers.nildram.co.uk (smithers.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8D243F75 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:29:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from martin@martinshouse.com) Received: from dvb (195-149-37-139.dial.nildram.co.uk [195.149.37.139]) by smithers.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03FF284DA9 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 07:29:26 +0100 (BST) From: Martin Johnson To: openoffice@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1066631362.21898.8.camel@speedy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 07:29:22 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Wrong URL link? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 06:29:46 -0000 Hi, >From http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ > Port status: > 1.1 RC5 is available now. Please try it out and report any bugs > to openoffice@freebsd.org. 1.03_2 is in the ports collection now. > Packages for 1.03_2 will follow slowly. The package format has changed > again back from tbz2 to tgz for STABLE. CURRENT has still .tbz > packages. Some important bugs have been fixed. OO.org is now usable > for production use. > > Port Skeleton: > http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/editors/openoffice I'd like to test OOo 1.1. Is the correct port skeleton URL http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-devel/ ?? I'm guessing "ports/editors/openoffice" is the old stable version 1.0, while ports/editors/openoffice-devel is the brand-new release 1.1 - is that correct? Many thanks! -- Martin Johnson