From owner-freebsd-scsi Tue Jun 10 12:56:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA28166 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 12:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.cmnsens.zoom.com (mail-relay.cmnsens.zoom.com [207.33.155.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA28159 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 12:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmnsens (cmnsens.cmnsens.zoom.com [207.33.155.2]) by dragon.cmnsens.zoom.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA03316 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 12:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199706101956.MAA03316@dragon.cmnsens.zoom.com> From: "Mike Burgett" To: "scsi@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 97 12:56:48 -0700 Reply-To: "Mike Burgett" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 1.92 For OS/2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: twisted pair "flat" cable, vs teflon cable... Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've been observing the scsi cable info flying around the list, and since I'm having some problems I believe are related to a fully loaded cable, I've been looking for a replacement. I've not found a local supplier of the 'flat' twisted cable, but I have found someone that wants to sell me teflon flat cable, claiming it's noise/crosstalk rejection is as good as, or superior to twisted pair... Anyone know if this is gospel, or sales smoke-and-mirrors? Thanks, Mike