Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:32:37 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Default sshd_config settings Message-ID: <20010211133237.A87178@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <20010211132838.W3274@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:28:38PM -0800 References: <000701c0945c$eb3eaff0$0300a8c0@magus> <20010211121803.A78601@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211124834.T3274@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010211124958.A79375@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211130149.U3274@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010211131638.B79776@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211132838.W3274@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:28:38PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> [010211 13:17] wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:01:49PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >=20 > > > Usually hearing something from Peter Wemm qualifies as research... :) > >=20 > > Haha.. >=20 > Well since it does seem to work, why aren't we forcing the use of > it on the FreeBSD.org cluster? Alleged Kerberos issues. Since Peter is the source of both rumours, perhaps we should re-test that one too :-) Kris --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6hwT1Wry0BWjoQKURAktyAJ41TaS52OZuyN0oqqXYGQAjSILnAQCfYsyM 1ilh6DCwxOMWTgTuQV8z2ZY= =QAEh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010211133237.A87178>