Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:10:50 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Damian Gerow <damian@sentex.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcpslice out of date Message-ID: <20031009171050.GA15948@intruder.kitchenlab.org> In-Reply-To: <20031009025421.8407143FAF@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <20031009025421.8407143FAF@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Damian Gerow wrote: > I was working with tcpdump and tcpslice earlier today, and had a bit of a > struggle when I found out that it's not Y2K compliant - it doesn't > understand any year beyond 1999. After stating this on a mailing list, it > was pointed out that the current source is indeed compliant, but the > FreeBSD source is a little out-dated. >=20 > Any chance we could get an updated tcpslice (and possibly tcpdump, I > haven't checked to see if it's out of date or not) imported after 4.9? There's a newer (Y2K-compliant) version in ports (net/tcpslice). I was talking with Bill Fenner (CC-ed) about the possibility of importing this newer version to the base system but I think both of us had too many other things to deal with. :-p IMHO, we should either import a newer version to the base system or kill it altogether and rely on the one in ports. Bruce. --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/hZaa2MoxcVugUsMRAiVCAKCfXH5CwC4G/bhJrqNKOFHjtUUaOgCg3De3 7ZNkcrGPyOVVxown8Bnw2S0= =f+KM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031009171050.GA15948>