Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 23:10:41 -0500 From: Randall Hopper <aa8vb@ipass.net> To: Jim King <king@sstar.com>, Steve Reid <sreid@sea-to-sky.net> Cc: Marc van Woerkom <van.woerkom@netcologne.de>, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Success: Quake 3 DemoTest under FreeBSD Message-ID: <19991214231041.A3893@ipass.net> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991213221719.00ae1b88@mail.sstar.com> References: <19991213230311.A9329@ipass.net> <19991214001752.A1099@grok.localnet> <19991127144223.A417@grok.localnet> <Your <199911270225.DAA00587@oranje.my.domain> <4.2.0.58.19991126220749.01662ca8@mail.sstar.com> <199911272014.VAA05055@oranje.my.domain> <19991127144223.A417@grok.localnet> <19991213230311.A9329@ipass.net> <4.2.0.58.19991213221719.00ae1b88@mail.sstar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jim King: |Randall Hopper: |>BTW, q3demoTEST-1.10-5 working absolutely stellar here on my Pure3D, and |>well (though slower) on my G200. | |You have to precede commands with a slash in the latest q3, e.g. "/set |timedemo 1" Thanks, that's what I needed. Just curious what I'd get. 15fps with my old Pure3D (Voodoo Graphics) and 6.5fps with the G200. Both at 640x480. Steve Reid: |Lack of direct rendering is the main thing holding back the non-3dfx |cards. As far as I know the GLX code is using all of the G200's |features. Right, I realize DRI is the main win we'll get with XFree86 4.0. The G200 frames look very nice. My GLX libGL is 3 months old, so a more recent cut might look even better. I haven't optimizized anything -- not much point without DRI. Just wanted a benchmark to compare against future versions. Thanks, Randall To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991214231041.A3893>