From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jun 18 18:09:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A95CA79828 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 18:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C15C2B55 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 18:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3rX4s65jmwzZvG for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:09:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1466273385; x=1468087786; bh=4ZepMtprGgWGH9tABzllEPQEEvV3bbAf6B2 tQ1l8fdQ=; b=WXar/hyThA/YSZcrihTOPWwuPpLPFl8cmFNE/josyAjc8veKm13 IfgMO81b0xoGSNIq3/aOTumIPo0ZOnFuFGOKUSEaebstShTHbjh2dqSI5M8ebb3g Mc5dwdWEa8IMLseh8RidCNh5t3OyyZEirjJc0cAua+RHktnNElFYVRvY= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3xeXoN8sFjQ for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:09:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:09:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different compared to 10,3 compiler? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <64e51a34-fced-4f7f-2a3f-9508c6c24b39@rawbw.com> <20160618172005.GA19494@home.opsec.eu> From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: <15db9574-831c-7055-895f-7dcbd2f9a144@madpilot.net> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:09:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 18:09:56 -0000 On 06/18/16 19:35, Yuri wrote: > On 06/18/2016 10:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> >There are two questions: >>> >1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3? >> Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ? > > > It looks like compiler on 10.1 is broken, because c++11 or c++14 isn't > (fully) supported there. > Now these fallout messages will keep coming and nothing can be done to > fix them. FreeBSD 10.1 is anyway a supported version, it's not superseded by 10.3, so, if your port breaks there, you should try to fix it, or mark it broken explicitly. The cluster always uses the oldest supported dot release of every branch to build packages, because in this way packages can be used on all newer dot releases. The opposite could not be true. Finally, please note that starting with the upcoming 11.0 release the support policy is going to change and this kind of situation cannot happen with the new policy. -- Guido Falsi