Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:59:33 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: attilio@FreeBSD.org Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r243515 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <50CD9B85.1040404@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndAsjZSK9XGFhHvdcD5135Xo4acybPDtZ0J9jXeAMpH5%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201211251422.qAPEM8BV074656@svn.freebsd.org> <CAJ-FndCGe=DtqKxRe0YXV0GJrf4CV6MX9B1MR-Uyy6A3hpongA@mail.gmail.com> <50C9B525.2060503@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-FndAsjZSK9XGFhHvdcD5135Xo4acybPDtZ0J9jXeAMpH5%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 13/12/2012 22:17 Attilio Rao said the following: > Right, but as I said, for the time being we can at least have a > correct panic() semantic and take the right time to fix the > generic_stop_cpus() and then absorb also the panic() fix into it. > Right now the mechanism is still broken in panic and it can be fixed > with a very easy fix, so we should just do it. > This will also help vendors like Sandvine which may have hit just this bug too. Perhaps I got confused... Could you please re-explain to me your suggestion to fix panic(9)? Because I thought that it would require exactly the same steps as fixing generic_stop_cpus(). Sorry about this. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50CD9B85.1040404>