From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 14:43:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B8816A41F; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (ns1.freebsdmall.com [69.50.233.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA8443D45; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id E9AC91CE55; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:43:52 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20050823144352.GC18974@freebsdmall.com> References: <200508230521.j7N5Lbgu004518@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050823070930.GA2967@soaustin.net> <20050823140419.N46459@orion> <20050823124914.GC78876@eddie.nitro.dk> <20050823155128.H1329@orion> <20050823130128.GD78876@eddie.nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050823130128.GD78876@eddie.nitro.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , Mark Linimon , doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide article.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:43:53 -0000 On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:01:28PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > I just digged out Mark's mail from when I asked the exact same question: > > Nope, these aren't the same. i.e. we have packages for 5-STABLE and > 5.4-RELEASE but there is no room for 5.3-RELEASE. > > No doubt the wording should be improved or examples should be given. The distinction between version and release seems very artificial. All releases are assigned version numbers. All version numbers correspond to a release of our software. We have a strong distinction between major branches, release branches, and releases in our existing releng documentation, but I've never seen any other attempt to pry apart 'release' and 'version'. I agree it should be improved or the second line should just be removed. - Murray