From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 16:15:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15E416A496 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9351F13C4EC for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7F57A10B; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:15:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:15:28 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: Aj3d6C+om76u+JmT0oMKF/kfGlQQBwkn/+HPvADhKfYl 1197648927 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF5529E57; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:15:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4762AC1E.3030101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:15:26 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070928) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Judge References: <47628E11.7030803@tomjudge.com> In-Reply-To: <47628E11.7030803@tomjudge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net , max@love2party.net, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spurious error from i[pf]_carp X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:15:28 -0000 Tom Judge wrote: > I guess that there will be more than one VRRP implementation that does > not generate packets with a header the same size as the carp header. > > I will look into generating a patch for this over the weekend, > however any thoughts/suggestions would be appreciated before I start > working on it. Sounds fine to me, thanks for doing this. It is regrettable that CARP had to come into existence in the first place because of the VRRP intellectual property situation, and I guess this is one of the turds which end up floating in everyone's midst as a result, if you'll pardon the analogy. regards, BMS