Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:11:50 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> To: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> Cc: Craig Boston <craig@yekse.gank.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does security/amavisd-new depend on db3? Message-ID: <200511142311.51781.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20511142317t4d192692n28d169aa73e6bbb2@mail.gmail.com> References: <c21e92e20511130557g4ad76176l85beb6ceee078886@mail.gmail.com> <200511142259.45090.ringworm01@gmail.com> <c21e92e20511142317t4d192692n28d169aa73e6bbb2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 14 November 2005 23:17, Jiawei Ye wrote: > On 11/15/05, Michael C. Shultz <ringworm01@gmail.com> wrote: > > The WITH_BDB_VER=42 only needs to be applied to databases/p5-BerkeleyDB, > > > > when "portmanager security/amavisd-new" is run ports will build in this > > order: > > > > ports/databases/db42 before > > databases/p5-BerkeleyDB before > > security/amavisd-new > > > > I'm sure there is a simple explanaition for the problem if Jiawei would > > only post something demonstrating how things are going wrong for him > > instead of merely describing what he thinks is happening. > > > > -Mike > > I am trying to, Mike. Now that xorg-clients has a RUN_DEPENDS on > xterm, which lists xorg-clients as CONFLICT adds a lot to the > frustration :( > > Jiawei > > -- > "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." > --inspired by The Tao of Programming If your running portmanager, just answer yes when it asks to remove the conflict, only xterm gets rebuilt. If you run portmanager security/amavisd-new It should keep things focused to just what is relevent to security/amavisd-new I don't see any xorg dependencies in their, do you? -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511142311.51781.ringworm01>