From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 23:33:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6CA1EF; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (smtp1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21832764; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B2DD720E7088C; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:33:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DOS_OE_TO_MX, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,RDNS_DYNAMIC,STOX_REPLY_TYPE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from r2d2 (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.141.170]) by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43DD420E70886; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Jim Barker" , "Mark Felder" References: <1401814138.84520.YahooMailNeo@web121106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1401827904.21523.YahooMailNeo@web121106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Solaris 10 zfs bug Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 00:33:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:33:44 -0000 Its likely FreeBSD is quite different in that area, unless you can reproduce on a FreeBSD install its unlikely we're going to be able to do much about it. You might consider seeing if anyone on the openzfs lists knows of the issue though. Regards Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Barker" To: "Mark Felder" Cc: ; Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:38 PM Subject: Re: Solaris 10 zfs bug Mark, I was looking at the timeframes that the core dumps occurred and around that time we were doing some zfs sends to replicate some data on there. So either the snapshot creation, zfs send, or snapshot deletion may have triggered the bug. Jim ________________________________ From: Mark Felder To: Jim Barker Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 1:07 PM Subject: Re: Solaris 10 zfs bug On 2014-06-03 11:48, Jim Barker wrote: > FYI: > > I encountered a bug in Solaris 10 that may also be present in the code > that FreeBSD forked some time ago. This is the forum entry I put up > in case it's relevant. > > https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=46716&p=261143#p261143 > > Do you have any details on how to reproduce the panic? That would permit the developers to find the bug in the FreeBSD port of ZFS and fix it. _______________________________________________ freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"