From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 3 19:13:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA25243 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:13:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA25225 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:13:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA37721; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:13:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Gustavo Vieira G C Rios cc: BSD-Stable Subject: Re: 3.0 stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 04 Feb 1999 01:03:37 -0200." <36B90E09.D2E22CED@netshell.vicosa.com.br> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 19:13:53 -0800 Message-ID: <37717.918098033@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > sorry about this stupid question, but i heard that 3.0 stable are not so > stable as 2.2.8 Don't believe everything you hear, or if you hear something and want confirmation of a specific complaint then raise *that* as a question in this forum. Installing a 3.0 snapshot from releng3.freebsd.org has not made any of my systems less stable, I can say that much, and much of what has been touted as "instability" lately has more to do with people upgrading from /usr/src and running over all the bumps of trying to transition an a.out system to an ELF one in developer mode with no seat belts. Those that do binary upgrades from, or (more recommended) clean installations of 3.1 will not suffer from those problems. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message