From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 13:20:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70069106566C for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AAA8FC1C for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3EDK2ku089582 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m3EDK2Xa089579; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:20:02 GMT Message-Id: <200804141320.m3EDK2Xa089579@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Daniel Roethlisberger Cc: Subject: Re: ports/116778: security/nmap ping-scan misses some hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Roethlisberger List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:20:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/116778; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Roethlisberger To: "Mark D. Foster" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/116778: security/nmap ping-scan misses some hosts Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:16:56 +0200 Mark, would you try to reproduce the problem using the updated nmap-4.60, please? Please also try whether using --scan-delay 10 (or 20, or 60) makes a difference. Thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=116778 -- Daniel Roethlisberger