From owner-freebsd-fs Fri Jun 26 17:37:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA09626 for freebsd-fs-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:37:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bofh.cybercity.dk (bofh.cybercity.dk [195.8.137.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA09571 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 17:37:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.133.1]) by bofh.cybercity.dk (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA18543 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 00:40:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA00254 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 00:37:35 +0200 (CEST) To: fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: specfs oddity... From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 00:37:34 +0200 Message-ID: <252.898900654@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Does anybody know why spec_open for VCHR devices does a VOP_UNLOCK() / vn_lock(vp, LK_EXCLUSIVE) around the devicedriver open routine but doesn't do it for VBLK devices ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message