Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Sep 1996 15:00:48 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
To:        "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Cc:        "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>, rohit@cs.UMD.EDU, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Giant Sized Ethernet Packets 
Message-ID:  <2739.843138048@critter.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Sep 1996 08:50:02 EDT." <199609191250.IAA27562@whizzo.transsys.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199609191250.IAA27562@whizzo.transsys.com>, "Louis A. Mamakos" writ
es:

>Being able to support FDDI MTUs would eliminate needless fragmentation
>which is very time consuming to perform in routers.   I'd love to have
>FDDI (or larger!) size MTU support in Fast Ethernet VLSI.  I think that
>this is likely going to be part of Gigabit ethernet as it develops, and

I don't think FDDI MTU is enough.  I would expect 9180 to be the next
good step, since it allows 8k NFS to stay in one packet for instance.
I belive this is the standard for SMDS & ATM and other new media.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2739.843138048>