From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 07:47:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7ADBC39BB for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA47A1D4F for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u7P7S6vQ095736; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:28:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: ieee 754 and p854 To: "Kevin P. Neal" , Anton Shterenlikht References: <201608241648.u7OGmRCj084423@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <20160825002404.GA95876@neutralgood.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <721affab-7b9f-f366-c046-d594be36bce1@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:28:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160825002404.GA95876@neutralgood.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:47:17 -0000 On 25/08/2016 01:24, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 05:48:27PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> ieee(3) and many older sources mention p854 as >> an extension to standard 754. I cannot find >> any trace of p854 past 1985. Has it been obsoleted >> by the development of 754? > > Wasn't 854 base 10? I have a vague memory that 854 was incorporated into > the 2008 revision of 754. > > There's probably more if you care to wade through it: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754_revision > >From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_854-1987 The standard was published in 1987, nearly immediately superseded by IEEE 754-1985 but never terminated (the year of ratification appears after the dash). IEEE 854 did not specify any formats, whereas IEEE 754-1985 did. Sounds like 854 was a bit of a false start and/or duplicate effort. -- Schrödinger's cat had 18 half lives.