From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Apr 21 11:26:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A968437B404 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39A14CE8E; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:27:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA09418; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:26:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id LAA05288; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200204211826.LAA05288@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: kbyanc@posi.net Subject: Re: Overflowing sockaddr_dl's sdl_data buffer Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:26:51 -0700 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.4/makemail 2.9b Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think that sdl_data should go back to being a variable-length buffer, and the source routing stuff should be reimplemented somewhere else (perhaps at the end of the variable-length buffer). What uses the source-routing fields? Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message