Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:34:14 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Thomas Moestl <t.moestl@tu-bs.de>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portversion/portupgrade Message-ID: <p0521060abafafc061e0c@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20030528234914.GA1987@crow.dom2ip.de> References: <F455E4114C4AD211BCDF00805F31BCF312B27EE3@USSAM203> <20030528214711.GA94049@rot13.obsecurity.org> <p05210608bafae02394b7@[128.113.24.47]> <20030528220215.GA94270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030528222144.GA667@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030528222244.GA94418@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030528234914.GA1987@crow.dom2ip.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:49 AM +0200 5/29/03, Thomas Moestl wrote: >On Wed, 2003/05/28, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Hmm, I thought knu made a change to bsd.ruby.mk some time > > ago that switched sparc64 over to using ruby-devel, but the > > problem persists with freshly-built ports. > >Hmmm, yes, I must have misremebered that. >The bug really seems to be in ruby-bdb1, which is also marked >NOT_FOR_ARCHS=sparc64. > >I just got portupgrade to work on my box, however by changing >the dependency in the Makefile from ruby-bdb1 to ruby-bdb >(as already hinted in a comment) and dropping the attached >patch into files/ to make it use ruby-bdb instead of ruby-bdb1 >by default. I haven't upgraded portupgrade and ruby on my sparc64 box for awhile. It was working when I started to investigate this. I rebuilt ruby, and after that I started having problems with portupgrade. Note that in my case ruby-bdb1 was already installed, so the dependency-checking did not fail, although I was getting errors from portupgrade commands. One portupgrade problem led to another, and eventually I just moved aside /var/db/pkg and /usr/local, and started over. I do not have many ports installed, so that was a simple solution. I followed the suggestions from Thomas, and it seems to be going OK for me. There were a few oddities in building things though, which I should figure out. Initially I somehow managed to build portupgrade without building ruby-bdb. It was even working fine, until I did tried 'portversion' and that complained about a stale-dependency (the missing ruby-bdb). However I'm doing this on a rather slow machine, and at this point I need to leave for the day. I'll try to look into it some more tomorrow. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0521060abafafc061e0c>