From owner-freebsd-security Sat Sep 18 23:36:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from proxy2.ba.best.com (proxy2.ba.best.com [206.184.139.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F60214D2D for ; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 23:36:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com ([209.157.86.2]) by proxy2.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with ESMTP id XAA28542; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 23:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id XAA68995; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 23:34:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 23:34:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199909190634.XAA68995@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , imp@village.org (Warner Losh), liam@tiora.net (Liam Slusser), kdrobnac@mission.mvnc.edu (Kenny Drobnack), Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu (Harry M. Leitzell), security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel References: <14489.937722438@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org :You have not proved or even shown that changing this particular :element will be enough to guarantee that we can support other :protocols in the future. : :The only thing that can be done to the jail(2) syscall to improve :it in that respect is to add a version number as the first element, :I would have no problem with that. : :-- :Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member Well, I see it quite differently. I believe I have given ample justification for asking that the system call be cleaned up before it is exposed to wider use. You're making a blanket comments saying "Matt hasn't proved..." and not even trying to address the issues brought up doesn't really pull any weight with me. Try addressing the issues that were brought up instead. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message