From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 18:28:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071A02A0 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x231.google.com (mail-vc0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B987D1CB4 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id if17so2384203vcb.36 for ; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:28:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bxUg7Qjaz6LDnpVtQKiP+GS5xOel+CWRvALwld6hfqs=; b=VNlS/D0dcEa+RYy9tQc5WEfQNN0RaSetaTHS1/Fg/O7hR59D3BkOQzPQeuNjRI7Ey4 Sm/PdqL7MBV5MM4PfMYYKqF9cnPQ4hiV2ko0s+rRyt9rthL531bZMhasxipMMsHq1gxC c0cLpC8F1lkHZ3Kxj3YaGkRfqeXHUSu2Cgdeks5i8ZqWb+WK3C1ATR9XT7xoJArkWyL5 JLsAqV7vHGyIp7p66kE9lK0EgWLKzfO8RTSDCZJfcwmP/wYL2SPzI44+Dedx6BtFPz4p 0+0SzAvTltszQyrvpGLtKRHPpDDbwl/c61e19d25quOlXglWKxDM0blDl0yONlK+xJKr THIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.27.8 with SMTP id ro8mr1788296vcb.30.1397068102285; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.239.84 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:28:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53454F42.8070003@tundraware.com> References: <53454EFA.3040207@tundraware.com> <53454F42.8070003@tundraware.com> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:28:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does openssl Fix Bump The Version Number? From: Thomas Hoffmann To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Tim Daneliuk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:28:24 -0000 On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 04/09/2014 08:45 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> I did a source tree update to 264294 and then a build world/kernel >> followed >> by install/reboot. But I still see this: >> >> >> [root] fuzzball ~>openssl version >> OpenSSL 1.0.1e-freebsd 11 Feb 2013 >> >> >> So ... it the version number supposed to be getting bumped or am I simply >> not really patched ... and why.... >> >> > I should mention this is 10-STABLE amd64 >From what I can see, the patch has not been MFC'd to 10-STABLE, since on a freshly checked out working copy r264302 I see in /usr/src/crypto/openssl/CHANGES: Changes between 1.0.1d and 1.0.1e [11 Feb 2013] whereas in my -CURRENT r264289 amd64 I see: Changes between 1.0.1f and 1.0.1g [7 Apr 2014] and as expected I get: # openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.1g-freebsd 7 Apr 2014 -Tom