Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:19:47 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Barb problem, FOUND Message-ID: <199703162219.PAA06467@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199703162219.PAA03645@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Mar 16, 97 03:19:20 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : *ALL* the members are virtual? > : > : Even the constructor, which isn't allowed to be? > > Ummm, the ctor isn't a member function, it is special :-) OK, then I don't know why it's bitching. It's perfectly valid to have a virtual destructor inline: the STL library book does it, so it's an OK thing to do. Yes, I *know* you would generate extra code (if you weren't running ELF or some other agregable object format, or if you were and your linker was stupid as a box of rocks. Personally, I think it's a compiler bug. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703162219.PAA06467>