From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 5 12: 8:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from albert.gate5.de (gatekeeper.gate5.de [212.84.193.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED24D37B408 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:08:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cc@devcon.net) Received: from localhost (cc@localhost) by albert.gate5.de (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f65J7Xv01569 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 21:07:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from cc@devcon.net) X-Authentication-Warning: albert.gate5.de: cc owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 21:07:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Carstensen X-X-Sender: To: Subject: background fsck panics? Message-ID: X-NCC-RegId: de.devcon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, after some weeks without softupdates, i recently reenabled them on my notebook. it seems, that my problems still exist. background checking one of my partitions leads to a panic() complaining about some "block too large" error. sorry, i didn't capture the message, and for obvious reasons i don't like reproducing that condition. it might be useful to know, that fsck checks all other partitions without problems. moreover, that one partition that causes the problem, contains a ".fsck_snapshot" entry: slot 5 ino 0 reclen 444: regular, `.fsck_snapshot' any ideas? best, christian -- "Sorry, no defects found. Please try a different search" [http://www.cisco.com/support/bugtools/bugtool.shtml] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message