From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 28 03:42:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A2E16A4CE for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 03:42:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from eborcom.com (dsl-62-3-122-102.zen.co.uk [62.3.122.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1471343FCB for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 03:42:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 94632 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Nov 2003 11:42:49 -0000 Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:42:49 +0000 From: Tom Hukins To: Sergey Matveychuk Message-ID: <20031128114249.GA94603@eborcom.com> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Hukins , Sergey Matveychuk , Oliver Eikemeier , FreeBSD ports , Joe Marcus Clarke References: <3FC62330.6060507@FreeBSD.org> <3FC6BB72.9080202@ciam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FC6BB72.9080202@ciam.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: FreeBSD ports cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: Oliver Eikemeier Subject: Re: PORTVERSION and portlint X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:42:54 -0000 On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 06:05:22AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > Yes, I see. But russian/apache13-modssl use > PORTVERSION= ${VERSION_APACHE}+${VERSION_RA}+${VERSION_MODSSL} > > If we change '+' with '.' we'll get something not readable: > 1.3.29.30.19.2.8.16 > > Where is apache version, nodssl version? You can't say without look at > port Makefile. In the case of Apache with mod_ssl, why not use the mod_ssl version number and ignore Apache's version? In general, a new release of mod_ssl comes out for each new release of Apache. If this stops being the case, we could bump PORTREVISION when Apache changes. Tom