From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 14 07:55:37 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA03493 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 07:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA03484; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 07:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA00714; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:55:00 +0200 (MET DST) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw vs ipfilter In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Aug 1996 07:35:27 PDT." <14773.840033327@time.cdrom.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:54:59 +0200 Message-ID: <710.840034499@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <14773.840033327@time.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> Heh:) >> Well..intresting enough it always works this way - first ppl take it, then >> they screw it and then they say it's bad and take something else. >> Thanx guys... > >With all due respect, Ugen, the code was a filthy mess when you gave >it to us and was in absolutely no shape to continue using in that way. Not to mention that it didn't work as it gave impression of doing. The only think I have against ditching ipfw and replacing with ipfilter is that the later is getting to big for comfort. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.