From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 31 11:32:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2540B106566B for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D301F8FC17 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A9E19E044; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.43.15.6] (cage.codelab.cz [94.124.105.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91E9619E043; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:15:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A72D251.4070506@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:15:29 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cezary Morga References: <1248027417.14210.110.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <200907232335.54973.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A6FF5FA.5010904@FreeBSD.org> <200907282342.25038.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A707534.8000808@FreeBSD.org> <20090729170601.GA2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A709981.80600@FreeBSD.org> <20090729200013.GB2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A70ACD2.6030804@FreeBSD.org> <20090729203552.GC2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A728725.70003@therek.net> In-Reply-To: <4A728725.70003@therek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:32:29 -0000 Cezary Morga wrote: > Alson van der Meulen pisze: > >> * Doug Barton [2009-07-29 22:10]: >> >>> I'm planning to remove the -u option altogether. It actually does very >>> little now, and certainly does not do what most users expect it should >>> do. > > > If I may chip in here on a similar note. > I'm currently looking for a port management tool that might replace good > ol' portinstall/portupgrade tools in my toolbox. Portmaster looks > promising but I noticed that it doesn't seem to take BATCH=yes in my > /etc/make.conf into consideration. So, is it me or there's something > more I have to do? I think BATCH=yes is unrelated to portmaster. This variable is (should be) read by port build process it-self as if you build it by command cd /usr/ports/category/port & make install clean Miroslav Lachman