Date: Mon, 15 Dec 97 13:11:18 -0500 From: Garance A Drosehn <gad@mlor.its.rpi.edu> To: dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu, loverso@opengroup.org Cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to call ourselves? Message-ID: <9712151811.AA11405@mlor.its.rpi.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Robert LoVerso <loverso@opengroup.org> writes: > Sys names have historically been "arch_system". I.e., See this (dated, but > accurate) file: /afs/transarc.com/service/systypes > > We've already been using "i386_fbsd21" and "i386_fbsd22" (see > /afs/ri.osf.org/vice/i386_fbsd21). I suggest you stick with that format. > > Note that "i386" is (unfortunately) generic for the Intel family and is used > as such in many other PC-UNIX ports (i386_linux2 and i386_nbsd1, for instance). This seems like the right naming conventions to me, too. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer (MIME & NeXTmail capable) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy NY USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9712151811.AA11405>