Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Dec 97 13:11:18 -0500
From:      Garance A Drosehn <gad@mlor.its.rpi.edu>
To:        dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu, loverso@opengroup.org
Cc:        freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: What to call ourselves?
Message-ID:  <9712151811.AA11405@mlor.its.rpi.edu>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Robert LoVerso <loverso@opengroup.org> writes:
> Sys names have historically been "arch_system".  I.e., See this (dated, but
> accurate) file: /afs/transarc.com/service/systypes
> 
> We've already been using "i386_fbsd21" and "i386_fbsd22" (see
> /afs/ri.osf.org/vice/i386_fbsd21).  I suggest you stick with that format.
>
> Note that "i386" is (unfortunately) generic for the Intel family and is used
> as such in many other PC-UNIX ports (i386_linux2 and i386_nbsd1, for instance).

This seems like the right naming conventions to me, too.

---
Garance Alistair Drosehn     =     gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer        (MIME & NeXTmail capable)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;           Troy NY    USA



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9712151811.AA11405>