Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:10:08 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, ia64@FreeBSD.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, bmah@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New snapshot available shortly Message-ID: <200211182010.gAIKA8dx030084@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021118150326.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <XFMail.20021118150326.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
If memory serves me right, John Baldwin wrote:
> I have no problem with these changes going into the tree. In fact, I haven't
> even done the alpha or sparc64 builds and I can hold up until those changes a
> re
> submitted if desired. The DP2 release was quite rushed b/c I think some of u
> s
> were so frustrated w/ how late it was getting and how much things are draggin
> g
> on. 5.0 will certainly have more coordination. Also, we really need to crea
> te
> an re-ia64 if we haven't already. I'm also willing to help out with re stuff
> on ia64 if I ever procure a box. Per-platform trees would not scale.
Yep.
John and I actually talked about this a bit on Friday; release candidate
snapshots are actually the hardest to get consistent across the
different platforms since the tree is still in flux (albeit a slow state
of flux due to code freeze). We discussed using CVS date specs for this
("all platforms do a snapshot build as of noon on Thursday UTC").
Bruce.
PS. Actually, that's "five platforms with four active", since pc98 is
now using the stock release bits.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506
iD8DBQE92Ukg2MoxcVugUsMRApOmAKDtXSIZ53ErUr6fkkgsXL2aksYkCACeMRdZ
fKuSe2r1uiH1piES6quKZHc=
=Fr4s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211182010.gAIKA8dx030084>