From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 11 16:20:40 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2E116A56A
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:20:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CE6843D88
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:20:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 84916 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2006 16:20:18 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33)
	by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 11 Oct 2006 16:20:18 -0000
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:20:18 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20061011.182018.41709122.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: freebsd-security@dfmm.org
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <20061011083021.C2780@treehorn.dfmm.org>
References: <20061011102106.GY1594@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
	<20061011151458.L97038@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
	<20061011083021.C2780@treehorn.dfmm.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:33:04 +0000
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, security-officer@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:20:41 -0000

> I realize that resources to keep chasing this stuff are in limited supply, 
> but if you solicit the opinion of the community, I'd bet that more people 
> would rather see 4.x support continue than 5.x support.
> 
> I know that it would be a violation of the stated policy, but I think that 
> supporting 4.x and 6.x over the next year would benefit way more people 
> than the current plan of supporting 5.x and 6.x and eol'ing 4.x.

Yes, fully agreed. I'd much rather have longer support for 4.x than 5.x.

We still have lots of machines running 4.11 here.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no