From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug  3 13:41:15 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF661065672
	for <freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Aug 2011 13:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from xiurhn.etoilebsd.net (xiurhn.etoilebsd.net [94.23.37.58])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CA38FC1C
	for <freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Aug 2011 13:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by xiurhn.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 80)
	id A67A57E80D; Wed,  3 Aug 2011 15:24:32 +0200 (CEST)
To: <freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:24:32 +0200
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <af4873556ee9d4537fbcefe759b39d57@etoilebsd.net>
References: <af4873556ee9d4537fbcefe759b39d57@etoilebsd.net>
Message-ID: <51bb94aac2e461394eb532e5481fe053@etoilebsd.net>
X-Sender: bapt@FreeBSD.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.3
Subject: Re: why fully versionned vendorlib vendorbin and vendorarch?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
	<freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:41:15 -0000

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:18:06 +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't get why we used versionned vendorbin, vendorarch and
> vendorlib with perl it seems to only provide us problems: need of
> perl-after-upgrade, reinstallation of most p5- things after even a
> simple 5.12.3 -> 5.12.4 upgrade?
>
> why not follow what is done by default by the build system and use a
> string (not versionned for those variable) like perl5_vendors or
> something like that?
>
> That would also allow user to upgrade from 5.12 to 5.14 almost
> painless. if really changing from 5.12 to 5.14 can lead to majors
> incompatibility problems (which I'm not convinced at all) we could 
> use
> perl5.12 but not including the minor version which still is not that
> good to me but way better.
>
> regards,
> Bapt
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-perl@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-perl-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


As noone object I think that may say I can go ahead and fix that?

regards,
Bapt