From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jun 12 15:54:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 931) id 5E1E237B405; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:54:52 -0700 From: Juli Mallett To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: The Source Code Control System Message-ID: <20020612155452.A57120@FreeBSD.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Organisation: The FreeBSD Project X-Alternate-Addresses: , , , X-Affiliated-Projects: FreeBSD, xMach, ircd-hybrid-7 X-Towel: Yes Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, In my work as part of Mike Barcroft's team of people doing standards work such as bringing utilities up to conformance, I decided to do necessary bits to try to get SCCS in a form that could be brought into our source tree. As it is right now, I have a version of CSRG SCCS that mostly works but lacks a few standards-related options, and I have framework to bring a Public Domain C++ SCCS implementation into the build. I'm looking for architectural feedback not on either of those however, I am writing because a number of people have said they simply do not want any SCCS stuff in the base system. If the majority thinks this way, I will go and remove src/usr.bin/{help,sccs} and abandon my efforts to bring something into the source tree. Thanks. -- Juli Mallett FreeBSD: The Power To Serve Perception is prejudice / Don't classify me / Accept me as me / Not what you see To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message