From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 3 21:20:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56D61065674 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C828FC1A for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q33LK6c4082758 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:20:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q33LK6cF082757; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:20:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:20:06 GMT Message-Id: <201204032120.q33LK6cF082757@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org From: Marius Strobl Cc: Subject: Re: sparc64/141918: [ehci] ehci_interrupt: unrecoverable error, controller halted (sparc64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marius Strobl List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:20:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR sparc64/141918; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marius Strobl To: Manuel Tobias Schiller Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sparc64/141918: [ehci] ehci_interrupt: unrecoverable error, controller halted (sparc64) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:19:52 +0200 On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:00:56AM +0200, Manuel Tobias Schiller wrote: > On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:41:24 +0200 > Marius Strobl wrote: > > > Well, the individual patches shouldn't make things worse except for > > the second one causing more memory to be used so I'd suggest to > > combine them. If in the end things actually work we still can check > > what changes are needed for that. > > Looking at the Linux USB code, the FreeBSD one doesn't some to honor > > some DMA constraints and at least for the alignment it's actually > > hard to follow what value eventually is used. One thing that stands > > out is that for EHCI, the boundary is 4096. This is most easily fixed > > by defining USB_PAGE_SIZE to 4096 in sys/dev/usb/usb_busdma.h. > > > > Marius > > Ok, the second patch on its own doesn't appear to work either, so I'm > trying the combination of patches now. By the way: defining USB_PAGE_SIZE > to 4096 in sys/dev/usb/usb_busdma.h is a bad idea - the kernel panics with > a backtrace pointing into the mmu-related code. Probably has to do with > sparc64 mmu only supporting 8k pages, so I'm not terribly surprised... Okay, could you please give the following patch a try? http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/usb_busdma.diff Marius