From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 19 17:00:43 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE7D16A4F1;
	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:00:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk)
Received: from mx.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F05543D4C;
	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:00:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk)
Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (unknown [192.168.3.39])
	by mx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D8B386C28;
	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:00:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000)
	id 923EF1141D; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:00:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:00:37 +0200
From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20061019170036.GB1040@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References: <200610181906.k9IJ6Ai4091879@sorsby.org>
	<20061018200455.GB945@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
	<1161248562.71755.2.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1161248562.71755.2.camel@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>,
	crs@swcp.com
Subject: Re: compat3x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:00:43 -0000

On 2006.10.19 10:02:42 +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:

> Yeah, or use DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes (which really doesn't mean
> much, I think IGNORE_FORBIDDEN would be a better name).

DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES is to disable portaudit's checks, not
FORBIDDEN checks.  I'm actually not really sure what disables
FORBIDDEN checks.

But, I agree that DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES is a very poor name - if
only the knob did what the name indicates... :-).

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen