From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:06:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA901065674 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFFF8FC18 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:06:00 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApwEAKe6Jk2DaFvO/2dsb2JhbACDd6EjriyNZYEhgzd0BIRnhiI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,289,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="104584623" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-annu-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2011 10:05:59 -0500 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD38DB4192; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:05:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:05:59 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem To: Jean-Yves Avenard Message-ID: <1467099208.237022.1294412759820.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.201] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, marek sal , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, milu@dat.pl Subject: Re: NFSv4 - how to set up at FreeBSD 8.1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 15:06:01 -0000 > On 7 January 2011 08:16, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > When I said I recalled that they didn't do TCP because of excessive > > overhead, I forgot to mention that my recollection could be wrong. > > Also, I suspect you are correct w.r.t. the above statement. (ie. > > Sun's > > official position vs something I heard.) > > > > Anyhow, appologies if I gave the impression that I was correcting > > your > > statement. My intent was just to throw out another statement that I > > vaguely recalled someone an Sun stating. > > After hitting yet another serious bug in 8.2 ; I reverted back to 8.1 > > Interestingly, it now complains about having V4: / in /etc/exports > At one time the V4: line was required to be at the end of the /etc/exports file. (You could consider that a bug left over from the OpenBSD port, where it was a separate section of /etc/exports.) I removed that restriction from mountd.c at some point, but maybe after 8.1. So, try just moving the "V4:" line to the end of /etc/exports. > NFSv4 isn't available in 8.1 ? > It should be there, rick