From owner-cvs-all Tue Jun 27 3:39:44 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527AE37B746; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:39:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA06181; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:39:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: Will Andrews Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/news/diablo Makefile ports/news/diablo/files md5 post-install-notes ports/news/diablo/patches patch-aa ports/news/diablo/pkg INSTALL MESSAGE COMMENT DESCR PLIST ports/news/diablo/scripts diablo.sh createuser References: <200006261229.FAA47475@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000626083836.X85886@argon.gryphonsoft.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 27 Jun 2000 12:39:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:38:36 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Will Andrews writes: > Thanks for not changing the header. =) *shrug* I don't understand why not, but if the ports buffs say not to, who am I to argue? (I've never really understood the point of that header) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message