From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 28 14:05:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA29322 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 14:05:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gamefish.pcola.gulf.net (gamefish.pcola.gulf.net [198.69.72.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA29316 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 14:05:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net) Received: from localhost (psalzman@localhost) by gamefish.pcola.gulf.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA13605; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 16:04:16 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 16:04:16 -0600 (CST) From: Phillip Salzman To: Brian Feldman cc: gmarco@giovannelli.it, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wanton Atticizing is bad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > You can do that with natd. That is possible, but not logical. Say you have 2000 dialup users attempting to access the web at the same time... all coming from different IP addresses -- would you want the packet scanning to go at the Cisco, or at the NATd? Its simple to do a transparent proxy from the cisco, and does not require too much on the squid side (IPFILTER), with less on the router. -- Phillip Salzman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message