Date: 30 Jul 1999 09:27:08 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: green@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c Message-ID: <xzppv1a38dv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Bruce Evans's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 1999 11:17:37 %2B1000" References: <199907300117.LAA09942@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes: > > > > > 8 -> NBBy > > > > "number of bits by byte"? > > > Yep, that's exactly what it is. NBBY is much preferred to hardcoding 8 :) > > BITS_PER_BYTE is much preferred to NBBY. > You mean "Standard C's CHAR_BIT is much preferred to NBBy" when the number > of bits in a byte is actually wanted. Yes, but that's not what's wanted here. Or rather, what's wanted here is the number of bits per *network* byte. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzppv1a38dv.fsf>