From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Sep 2 18:23:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA08589 for stable-outgoing; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 18:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mh1.cts.com (root@mh1.cts.com [205.163.24.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA08584 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 18:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from io.cts.com (io.cts.com [198.68.174.34]) by mh1.cts.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA17798 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 18:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Apparently-To: Received: (from mdavis@localhost) by io.cts.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA12030 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 18:23:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Morgan Davis Message-Id: <199709030123.SAA12030@io.cts.com> Subject: de0: transmission timeout To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 18:23:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Real quick... System: Pentium system FreeBSD 2.2.2-STABLE SMC EtherPower 10/100, Rev A, DEC 21140-AC chip Problem: de0: transmission timeout Answer: ? Attempted it with two SMC cards to make sure it wasn't just a bum card. Same problem. The cards work fine in BSDI BSD/OS -based systems. If the SMC is not supported, what would be acceptable alternatives? Or, is this problem going to be addressed in the next release? Thank you. --Morgan Davis